Brief Intermission Two

RANDOM NOTES ON MODERN USAGE

English grammar is confusing enough as it is—what makes it doubly

confounding is that it is slowly but continually changing.

This means that some of the strict rules you memorized so

painfully in your high school or college English courses may no

longer be completely valid.

Following such outmoded principles, you may think you are

speaking “perfect” English, and instead you may sound stuffy and

pedantic.

The problem boils down to this: If grammatical usage is gradually

becoming more liberal, where does educated, unaffected, informal

speech end? And where does illiterate, ungrammatical speech

begin?

The following notes on current trends in modern usage are

intended to help you come to a decision about certain controversial

expressions. As you read each sentence, pay particular attention to

the italicized word or words. Does the usage square with your own

language patterns? Would you be willing to phrase your thought in

just terms? Decide whether the sentence is right or wrong, then

compare your conclusion with the opinion given in the explanatory

paragraphs that follow the test.

TEST YOURSELF

  1. If you drink too many vodka martinis, you will surely get sick.

RIGHT      WRONG

  2. Have you got a dollar?

RIGHT      WRONG

  3. No one loves you except I.

RIGHT      WRONG

  4. Please lay down.

RIGHT      WRONG

  5. Who do you love?

RIGHT      WRONG

  6. Neither of these cars are worth the money.

RIGHT      WRONG

  7. The judge sentenced the murderer to be hung.

RIGHT      WRONG

  8. Mother, can I go out to play?

RIGHT      WRONG

  9. Take two spoonsful of this medicine every three hours.

RIGHT      WRONG

10. Your words seem to infer that Jack is a liar.

RIGHT      WRONG

11. I will be happy to go to the concert with you.

RIGHT      WRONG

12. It is me.

RIGHT      WRONG

13. Go slow.

RIGHT      WRONG

14. Peggy and Karen are alumni of the same high school.

RIGHT      WRONG

15. I would like to ask you a question.

RIGHT      WRONG

  1. If you drink too many vodka martinis, you will surely get sick.

RIGHT. The puristic objection is that get has only one meaning—

namely, obtain. However, as any modern dictionary will attest, get

has scores of different meanings, one of the most respectable of

which is become. You can get tired, get dizzy, get drunk, or get sick—

and your choice of words will offend no one but a pedant.

  2. Have you got a dollar?

RIGHT. If purists get a little pale at the sound of “get sick,” they

turn chalk white when they hear have got as a substitute for have.

But the fact is that have got is an established American form of

expression. Jacques Barzun, noted author and literary critic, says:

Have you got is good idiomatic English—I use it in speech without

thinking about it and would write it if colloquialism seemed

appropriate to the passage.”

  3. No ones loves you except I.

WRONG. In educated speech, me follows the preposition except. This

problem is troublesome because, to the unsophisticated, the

sentence sounds as if it can be completed to “No one loves you,

except I do,” but current educated usage adheres to the technical

rule that a preposition requires an objective pronoun (me).

  4. Please lay down.

WRONG. Liberal as grammar has become, there is still no sanction

for using lay with the meaning of recline. Lay means to place, as in

Lay your hand on mine.” Lie is the correct choice.

  5. Who do you love?

RIGHT. “The English language shows some disposition to get rid of

whom altogether, and unquestionably it would be a better language

with whom gone.” So wrote Janet Rankin Aiken, of Columbia

University, way back in 1936. Today, many decades later, the

“disposition” has become a full-fledged force.

The rules for who and whom are complicated, and few educated

speakers have the time, patience, or expertise to bother with them.

Use the democratic who in your everyday speech whenever it sounds

right.

  6. Neither of these cars are worth the money.

WRONG. The temptation to use are in this sentence is, I admit,

practically irresistible. However, “neither of” means “neither one of”

and is, therefore, is the preferable verb.

  7. The judge sentenced the murderer to be hung.

WRONG. A distinction is made, in educated speech, between hung

and hanged. A picture is hung, but a person is hanged—that is, if such

action is intended to bring about an untimely demise.

  8. Mother, can I go out to play?

RIGHT. If you insist that your child say may, and nothing but may,

when asking for permission, you may be considered puristic. Can is

not discourteous, incorrect, or vulgar—and the newest editions of

the authoritative dictionaries fully sanction the use of can in

requesting rights, privileges, or permission.

  9. Take two spoonsful of this medicine every three hours.

WRONG. There is a strange affection, on the part of some people,

for spoonsful and cupsful, even though spoonsful and cupsful do not

exist as acceptable words. The plurals are spoonfuls and cupfuls.

I am taking for granted, of course, that you are using one spoon

and filling it twice. If, for secret reasons of your own, you prefer to

take your medicine in two separate spoons, you may then properly

speak of “two spoons full (not spoonsful) of medicine.”

10. Your words seem to infer that Jack is a liar.

WRONG. Infer does not mean hint or suggest. Imply is the proper

word; to infer is to draw a conclusion from another’s words.

11. I will be happy to go to the concert with you.

RIGHT. In informal speech, you need no longer worry about the

technical and unrealistic distinctions between shall and will. The

theory of modern grammarians is that shall-will differences were

simply invented out of whole cloth by the textbook writers of the

1800s. As the editor of the scholarly Modern Language Forum at the

University of California has stated, “The artificial distinction

between shall and will to designate futurity is a superstition that has

neither a basis in historical grammar nor the sound sanction of

universal usage.”

12. It is me.

RIGHT. This “violation” of grammatical “law” has been completely

sanctioned by current usage. When the late Winston Churchill made

a nationwide radio address from New Haven, Connecticut, many,

many years ago, his opening sentence was: “This is me, Winston

Churchill.” I imagine that the purists who were listening fell into a

deep state of shock at these words, but of course Churchill was

simply using the kind of down-to-earth English that had long since

become standard in informal educated speech.

13. Go slow.

RIGHT. “Go slow” is not, and never has been, incorrect English—

every authority concedes that slow is an adverb as well as an

adjective. Rex Stout, well-known writer of mystery novels and

creator of Detective Nero Wolfe, remarked: “Not only do I use and

approve of the idiom Go slow, but if I find myself with people who

do not, I leave quick.”

14. Peggy and Karen are alumni of the same high school.

WRONG. As Peggy and Karen are obviously women, we call them

alumnae (Ə-LUM′-nee); only male graduates are alumni (Ə-LUM′-nī).

15. I would like to ask you a question.

RIGHT. In current American usage, would may be used with I,

though old-fashioned rules demand I should.

Indeed, in modern speech, should is almost entirely restricted to

expressing probability, duty, or responsibility.

As in the case of the charitable-looking dowager who was

approached by a seedy character seeking a handout.

“Madam,” he whined, “I haven’t eaten in five days.”

“My good man,” the matron answered with great concern, “you

should force yourself!”